In a report by The Messenger Politics on Sunday, September 10, 2023, Kristin Tate discusses the potential strategy of the Democratic Party for the upcoming 2024 presidential election.
Tate suggests that the Democrats may lean heavily on mass mail-in voting as a means to secure victory, given concerns about the physical and mental well-being of President Biden, their presumed candidate.
This report analyzes the arguments presented by Tate and considers the implications of mass mail-in voting on the electoral landscape.
Tate’s main argument revolves around the idea that the Democratic Party faces significant challenges in the form of an aging and potentially unfit presidential candidate, Joe Biden.
She points to public opinion polls that indicate a substantial portion of the population doubts Biden’s ability to serve a second term.
Tate argues that, to overcome these hurdles, the Democrats may resort to replicating their 2020 strategy, which heavily relied on mass mail-in voting due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
In the 2020 election, the United States witnessed a historic shift in voting methods, with more than half of the electorate choosing to vote by mail rather than in-person.
Tate suggests that this expansion of voting by mail brought in voters who may not have otherwise participated, especially young people, and argues that this trend benefited the Democratic Party.
She provides examples of states like Pennsylvania, where the majority of mail-in ballots went for Joe Biden.
Tate also points out that the emergency measures put in place during the 2020 pandemic, such as counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day, significantly influenced the outcome of swing states like Pennsylvania.
She implies that such measures were enacted to favor Democratic candidates.
However, Tate’s analysis seems to focus predominantly on the potential advantages that mass mail-in voting could provide to the Democratic Party.
While she does mention that some Republican-led states also adopted mail-in voting measures, she primarily emphasizes that Republican voters typically prefer in-person voting on Election Day.
It is essential to note that concerns about the integrity of the election process and potential voter fraud have surrounded discussions of mass mail-in voting.
Tate’s analysis does not delve into these concerns, which have been central to the debate on the expansion of mail-in voting.
